‘Vampire Academy’ Review: Peacock Series Packs on the Plot but Struggles to Come Alive

The TV adaptation of the Richelle Mead book series gets lost in its own mythology

Sisi Stringer
Sisi Stringer as Rose Hathaway in "Vampire Academy" (Photo by: Jose Haro/Peacock)

There is one common modern TV problem that never plagues “Vampire Academy”: The sense that a show’s first season is a bunch of throat-clearing, set-up, and teasing for future seasons. This is a series with a decidedly opposite problem; it’s so saturated with characters, lore, and incident that by the second episode it feels like it’s filling the audience in on a half-season’s worth of previous adventures that they already missed.

Presumably some of these details come from the “Vampire Academy” book series by author Richelle Mead, which was previously adapted into a little-seen 2014 film of the same name. At the time, it seemed like a natural blending of the two biggest contemporary fantasy franchises, filling the void left by the end of the “Harry Potter” and “Twilight” movies: a magical and competitive boarding school from the former, populated by hormonal/sympathetic vampires from the latter.

Comments